Psychology, Interamerican
What do allies do?: Providing culturally responsive counseling to communities of color


multicultural counseling

How to Cite

Hipolito-Delgado, C., & Reinders Saeman, R. (2017). What do allies do?: Providing culturally responsive counseling to communities of color. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 51(2).


In the United States, the field of counseling has not kept pace with the changing ethnic demographics of larger society. As such, communities of color in the U.S. require the support of counselor allies. Allies are people from dominant socio-political groups who seek to end oppression. This study used grounded theory to examine the experience of six counselors who were identified as allies to communities of color. Based on the results of this study, we argue that allies possess self-awareness, personal knowledge of and connection to communities of color, and the skills of rapport building and engaging in critical conversations. They also participate in action on behalf of their students. Implications of these findings for counselor who seek to be allies to communities of color are provided.


American Counseling Association (2015). Membership report. Unpublished data

Arredondo, P., Toporek, R., Brown, S. P., Jones, J., Locke, D. C., Sanchez, J., & Stadler, H. (1996). Operationalization of the multicultural counseling competencies. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 24, 42 -78. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1996.tb00288.x

Birks M. & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Broido, E. (2000). The development of social justice allies during college: A phenomenological investigation. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 3 – 18.

Caldwell, L. D., Tarver, D. D., Iwamoto, D. K., Herzberg, S. E., Cerda-Lizarraga, P., & Mack, T. (2008). Definitions of multicultural competence: Frontline human service providers perspective. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 36, 88 - 100. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2008.tb00073.x

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Collins, A. & Arthur, N. (2010). Culture-infused counseling: A fresh look at a classic framework on multicultural counselling competencies. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 23, 203 - 216. doi: 10.1080/09515071003798204

Constantine, M. G., & Ladany, N. (2001). New visions for defining and assessing multicultural counseling competence. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (2nd ed., pp. 482-498). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Crotty, M. (1998). Introduction: The research process. In M. Crotty (Ed.) The foundation of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process (pp. 1 – 17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fassinger, R. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 156 – 166.

Grothaus, T., McAuliffe, G., & Craigen, L. (2012). Infusing cultural competence and advocacy into strength-based counseling. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 51, 51 - 65. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2012.00005.x

Heppner, P. (2006). The benefits and challenges of becoming cross-culturally competent counseling psychologists: Presidential address. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 147-172. doi: 10.1177/0011000005282832

Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (April, 2014). Beyond cultural competence. Counseling Today. Pp. 50 – 55.

Hipolito-Delgado, C. P., Cook, J., Avrus, E., & Bonham, E. (2011). Developing counseling students’ multicultural competence through the multicultural action project. Counselor Education and Supervision, 50, 402 – 421. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2011.tb01924.x

Holcomb-McCoy, C. C., (2000). Multicultural counseling competencies: An exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 28, 83 - 97. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2000.tb00609.x

Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2006). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues. New York: Routledge.

Lee, C. C. (2013). Multicultural issues in counseling: New approaches to diversity (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

Pedersen, P. (1990). The multicultural perspective as a fourth force in counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 12, 93-95.

Ratts, M. J., Singh, A. A., Nassar-McMillan, S., Butler, S. K., & McCullough, J. R. (2016). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies: Guidelines for the counseling profession. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44, 28 – 48. doi: 10.1002/jmcd.12035

Sue, D. W., Arredondo, P., & McDavis, R. J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and Standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 477 - 486. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01642.x

U.S. Census Bureau (2013). State and county quick facts. Retrieved from

Weinrach, S. G. & Thomas, K. R. (2002). A critical analysis of multicultural counseling competencies: Implications for practice of mental health counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 24, 20 - 35.

Yeh, C. J. & Inman, A. G. (2007). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation in counseling psychology: Strategies for best practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 369 – 403. doi: 10.1177/0011000006292596

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).